Re: [dwm] DWM is DWM

Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 03:35:38PM +0100, Leonhard Scherer wrote:
>
>> What I want to say is this:
>> Don't blow up the code of DWM; why don't you just use patches for your
>> special needs? The simpler DWM stays the easier is it for Anselm to code
>> it and for other people to expand the code.
>>
>
> If you check hg tip, you'll notice that the source is smaller
> than in dwm-2.2 ;)
>
> Regards,
>
Gooood :D

Since you are the developer, could you just tell us, what you gonna do?
As everybody can see, there are the two kinds of opinions: The ones who
want to keep at least most of the features and the ones who don't. ;)

How do you see DWM in the future? More features? Less features?

In which direction will DWM go?

Leo
Received on Thu Nov 23 2006 - 15:44:16 UTC