On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 07:13:00PM +0000, David Tweed wrote:
> Key points: (1) the tags array on a client is Bool, so we have 4 bytes used, so
> making an explicit int doesn't increase space reqs.
> (2) Any tagging operation eventually calls arrange(), which does at least one
> walk through full client list, so adding an additional scan here and there doesn't
> change asymptotic complexity.
This is an interesting idea, however, since it only works
predictable for singly-viewed tags, I don't consider this for
mainstream dwm.
Regards,
-- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Thu Nov 30 2006 - 09:41:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:32:55 UTC