Re: [dwm] Interesting idea by Gottox

On 11/30/06, Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org> wrote:
> Here we go. Gottox proposed to get rid of view(), and letting
> toggleview() do the work instead. This can be achieved through
> allowing that no tag is viewed. This results in the side-effect
> that during toggleview() clients with no tags at all (which
> appeared during the time when no tag was viewed and which
> haven't been matched with any rule) have to be tagged with the
> new tag.

Allowing windows to exist without any tags at all seems like a bad
idea to me. In what view should they appear? All or none? Both seem
wrong, and just tagging them with the first tag that is viewed after
they appeared isn't really clean either. Besides, the ability to
select just one tag for viewing is probably the quickest way to
"restructure" your view from scratch, I'd realy miss that.

Greetings, Sander.
Received on Thu Nov 30 2006 - 11:18:14 UTC