On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 09:51:17AM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:28:01PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 08:01:15AM +1300, Karl. wrote:
> > > I wondered if the tag-used indicator could be an underline instead, to
> > > reduce the load on my aging brain? Or something else, maybe - I'm not
> > > convinced that an underline is a better option than dots - I'd just like
> > > something more different from the client-tag dots.
> >
> > I noticed the same and got an idea, will present it tomorrow!
>
> This is my favorit:
> http://www.suckless.org/shots/indicator_proposal.png
>
> The dot indicates that this tag contains any clients, the border
> indicates the tags of the focused client.
I got a new favorit: http://www.suckless.org/shots/proposal2.png
With this in mind, I'd move the point to bottom right, and
change the semantic:
dot: tags of client
pseudo-3d: tag contains clients
Any complains?
Regards,
-- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Fri Dec 01 2006 - 10:12:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:33:06 UTC