On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 05:10:17PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> Tako rzecze Anselm R. Garbe (w e-mailu datowanym 2006-12-01, 17:06):
>
> > > I think the line is a better idea than the dots though.. two dots was
> > > extremely confusing. I think if I were implementing this sort of change,
> > > I'd manipulate the font weight before adding dots and lines. Maybe
> > > something like bold = current client, italics = empty tag.
> >
> > I think that might be the way to go...
>
> This will look terribly ugly on bitmap fonts with fake-italics (and
> often fake-bold too.
>
> How about trying a different background color instead of the second dot
> than (or any other graphic symbols)? Just one more color configurable
> from config.h. What do you think?
Nah, we already have enough colors. Let's check Sanders
proposal.
-- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Fri Dec 01 2006 - 17:16:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:33:16 UTC