Re: [dwm] new windows on slave area

From: Oliver Heins <olli_AT_sopos.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:57:57 +0100

"Sander van Dijk" <a.h.vandijk_AT_gmail.com>
writes:

> On 1/19/07, pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com> wrote:
>> I've defined two symbols for the tile and append modes:
>>
>> #define TILESYMBOL "[<="
>> #define APPENDSYMBOL "[>="
>>
>> So it looks cleaner for me, instead of "const char *..[]={"[<=",...}"

[...]

> I don't think this is needed, especially the extra symbol.

I'm not sure if I understand you, but for me the APPENDSYMBOL is
essential to know in what mode I am. This is a really useful feature
(whereas the %u indicator wasn't).

On a system where i did not apply tenders patch to the patch, I usually
get totally confused and insert new windows to the wrong column in 50%
of the time. So there is no real difference from a user pov if i apply
the patch or not -- windows certainly get inserted at a place i don't
want them to be.

regards,
 olli

-- 
Homepage: http://www.sopos.org/olli/
GnuPG-Key: http://www.sopos.org/pgp/olli.asc
GnuPG-Fingerprint: F27A BA8C 1CFB B905 65A8  2544 0F07 B675 9A00 D827
NP: Nothing
Received on Fri Jan 19 2007 - 20:58:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:35:23 UTC