Re: [dwm] dwm-3.6

From: Julian Romero <>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:57:54 +0100

On 2/21/07, Anselm R. Garbe <> wrote:
> Hi there,
> I released
> This release contains several code cleanups and refactoring. It
> also contains the mentioned change of how resize() has been
> called in the past and yet another improved version of
> configurerequest(). See the mailing list for details.
IMHO we need a developmen branch and a stable one. Quite easy with
mercurial, indeed.
My point is that a stable dwm with monthly releases (not a fixed amount of
time, but in this range) will benefit us in several ways:
 * less distracting (it will be easier to ignore development branch
 * patches will have time to really fine-tune their patches and add new ones
instead of being porting the patches every week
 * you can experiment more heavily in the dev branch (like changing colors
as much as you want w/out generating a new changeset which I read logs to
keep up to date when I can't follow the list)
 * everybody can help with st because they have a working-stable dwm

I know it's you creature, I'm just thinking aloud.


Received on Wed Feb 21 2007 - 13:57:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:37:46 UTC