Re: [dwm] regression with dwm rev. 867

From: Maarten Maathuis <madman2003_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 21:41:39 +0200

Isn't this due to the fact that terminals often only scale in discrete sizes
(related to line size)?

On 5/8/07, Enno Gottox Boland <gottox_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> :)
> I'm not the maintainer... Complain to arg...
>
> 2007/5/8, Jukka Salmi <j+dwm_AT_2007.salmi.ch>:
> > Enno Gottox Boland --> dwm (2007-05-07 21:02:36 +0200):
> > > Yes it is. This behavior saves some lines of code.
> >
> > Are you joking? Why not remove the whole tile() function, this would
> > save even more lines of code... ;-)
> >
> >
> > > 2007/5/7, Jukka Salmi <j+dwm_AT_2007.salmi.ch>:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> the most recent change to tile() causes the last client in the
> current
> > >> view to be smaller than needed, leaving a small rectangle in the
> lower
> > >> right of the screen unused. Is [1]this intended behaviour?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Regards, Jukka
> > >>
> > >> [1] http://salmi.ch/~jukka/dwm/root.png
> >
> > --
> > bashian roulette:
> > $ ((RANDOM%6)) || rm -rf ~
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro
> http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm - Gnuffy on Ipaq (Codename Peggy)
>
>
Received on Tue May 08 2007 - 21:41:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:41:02 UTC