Re: [dwm] BUG? firefox save as dialog

To toss my experience in to the mix - I've noticed it too. However, I've
noticed that if you toggle the size of the save-as window (whether
click-n-drag or remove it from the floating layer, and then send it back to
floating) then it behaves just fine.

At least to me, it appears that this occurs only on the initial window
size/draw.

On 5/10/07, Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:46:52PM +0200, Xavier wrote:
> > 2007/5/10, Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org>:
> > >
> > >The funny thing is, that the dialog requests the size it
> > >had before it requested the size. Looks like a weird gtk bug,
> > >but I will see if it can be fixed somehow.
> > >
> >
> > this link seems to suggest it wasn't present in 2.10.9 and appeared in
> > 2.10.10
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=420021
> >
> > and here is a fix:
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420285
>
> I see. Well I investigated into this issue on the dwm side, and
> it is clear that these specific GTK versions break ICCCM
> ConfigureRequest-Handling until this fix is applied officially.
> I cannot change dwm accordingly without adding kludges to get it
> to work correctly (note, one could extend Client with Bool
> ignoreconfreq; and then extending Rule similiar, so that one
> could define a rule for such window classes that allow dwm to
> ignore any configurerequests (or to answer them with a synthetic
> ConfigureNotify without changing anything for such cases -
> which might break clients who are completely broken anyways... ;))
>
> Let's wait some months that the GTK side will be fixed properly.
> So, dwm-4.1 is on its road.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
>
>

-- 
Pancho needs your prayers, it's true.  But save a few for Lefty, too.
-- T. Van Zandt