On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 04:06:44AM +0200, Engin Tola wrote:
>
> Can you tell at which places it fail ?
> I just recently *manually* patched it. Maybe I can assist.
>
>
> James Turner <james_AT_bsdgroup.org> writes:
>
> > Does anybody know if there is an updated patch for bottomstack? It
> > fails it two places while patching. Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > James Turner
> > BSD Group Consulting
> > http://www.bsdgroup.org
> >
>
> --
> engin tola - http://cvlab.epfl.ch/~tola/
> emacs - http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/tour/
Sure, below is the output of running patch -p1 inside my dwm-4.2 dir.
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- /usr/local/src/dwm/dwm-4.1-virgin/layout.c 2007-05-21
20:59:45.000000000 -0400
|+++ layout.c 2007-05-22 16:06:19.000000000 -0400
--------------------------
Patching file layout.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 14.
Hunk #2 failed at 38.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 81 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 194 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 232 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #6 failed at 341.
3 out of 6 hunks failed--saving rejects to layout.c.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- /usr/local/src/dwm/dwm-4.1-virgin/config.default.h 2007-05-21
20:59:45.000000000 -0400
|+++ config.default.h 2007-05-21 21:33:42.000000000 -0400
--------------------------
Patching file config.default.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 29 (offset -2 lines).
done
-- James Turner BSD Group Consulting http://www.bsdgroup.orgReceived on Sat Jun 16 2007 - 04:39:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:44:22 UTC