Re: [dwm] Feature request for changing master window's height.

On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 04:50:45AM +0200, Engin Tola wrote:
> James Turner <james_AT_bsdgroup.org> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 04:06:44AM +0200, Engin Tola wrote:
> >>
> >> Can you tell at which places it fail ?
> >> I just recently *manually* patched it. Maybe I can assist.
> >>
> >> > Does anybody know if there is an updated patch for bottomstack? It
> >> > fails it two places while patching. Thanks.
> >> >
> > Sure, below is the output of running patch -p1 inside my dwm-4.2 dir.
> >
> > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
> > The text leading up to this was:
> > --------------------------
> > |--- /usr/local/src/dwm/dwm-4.1-virgin/layout.c 2007-05-21
> > 20:59:45.000000000 -0400
> > |+++ layout.c 2007-05-22 16:06:19.000000000 -0400
> > --------------------------
> > Patching file layout.c using Plan A...
> > Hunk #1 failed at 14.
> > Hunk #2 failed at 38.
> > Hunk #3 succeeded at 81 (offset 12 lines).
> > Hunk #4 succeeded at 194 (offset -4 lines).
> > Hunk #5 succeeded at 232 (offset 12 lines).
> > Hunk #6 failed at 341.
> > 3 out of 6 hunks failed--saving rejects to layout.c.rej
> > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
> > The text leading up to this was:
> > --------------------------
> > |--- /usr/local/src/dwm/dwm-4.1-virgin/config.default.h 2007-05-21
> > 20:59:45.000000000 -0400
> > |+++ config.default.h 2007-05-21 21:33:42.000000000 -0400
> > --------------------------
> > Patching file config.default.h using Plan A...
> > Hunk #1 succeeded at 29 (offset -2 lines).
> > done
>
> this is pretty much illegible with only line numbers. I suggest you to
> open the diff file and layout.c. It is pretty much easy to follow the
> diff file and make the necessary changes. I also attach my own layout.c
> so that you can adapt yours appropriately. (if you haven't edited your
> layout file before, then you should have this layout in the end actually.)

Thanks for attaching your layout.c. Sorry the provided output wasn't
any help. I will just patch it by hand, I was really just curious if
the patch was still being maintained.

-- 
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org