Re: [dwm] first inofficial (#) dwm FAQ - to be reviewed/over-coworked

From: Sander van Dijk <a.h.vandijk_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 09:27:10 +0200

On 6/28/07, Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org> wrote:
> Well, I ignore this thread.

hehe, nice contradiction :-P
Received on Fri Jun 29 2007 - 09:27:12 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Szabolcs Nagy: "Re: [dwm] Subtle - a new tiling WM"
Previous message: Kurt H Maier: "Re: [dwm] first inofficial (#) dwm FAQ - to be reviewed/over-coworked"
In reply to: Anselm R. Garbe: "Re: [dwm] first inofficial (#) dwm FAQ - to be reviewed/over-coworked"
Next in thread: Denis Grelich: "Re: [dwm] slock fails"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:45:28 UTC