Re: [dwm] custom config.h handling

From: Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 09:10:29 +0200

On 9/23/07, Xavier <shiningxc_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 11:36:35PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > It should be possible to go back to the old
> > model and add some compile-error feature with each
> > incompatible config.h change for the people who
> > had problems. But wait, I thought dwm is for people
> > who know how to edit config.h, wasn't it :)
> >
>
> Previously, after an update, I just merged the changes manually
> using : vimdiff config.h config.arg.h
>
> When I saw config.default.h / config.arg.h moved to config.h,
> I first found it odd too. But since then, I did two updates
> where config.h changed, and mercurial just put the conflicting
> parts directly in config.h, in a diff like format.
> So well, I still merged the things manually, but just using vim
> config.h these times :)
> Not sure how good it is, but it worked fine for me.

I can live with that too but after Anselm said
"But my intention is, that nobody needs to reconfigure dwm.
It should just work perfectly for everyone."
I had to chime in :)
Received on Sun Sep 23 2007 - 09:10:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:54:47 UTC