Re: [dwm] [PATCH] An experiment with X resources

Chris Webb --> dwm (2007-09-24 14:30:23 +0100):
> This morning I've been thinking about run time configuration of dwm.
[...]

I only glanced at the code, but this seems to be a useful idea!

> +void *
> +erealloc(void *res, unsigned int size) {
> + if (!(res = res ? realloc(res, size) : malloc(size)))
> + eprint("fatal: could not realloc() %u bytes\n", size);
> + return res;
> +}

Hmm, why using the ternary operator? Are there systems where
`realloc(NULL, size)' does not behave identically to `malloc(size)'?

Regards, Jukka

-- 
bashian roulette:
$ ((RANDOM%6)) || rm -rf ~