Re: [dwm] Taglayouts poll

Btw if we use a diferent layout per tag we should probably also
support a different mwfactor per tag too in the same way.

btw i continue saying that I don't like this idea at all.

PD: I have updated the kiwi with the patch:
   http://www.suckless.org/wiki/dwm/patches/taglayouts

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:56:50 +0200
pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com> wrote:

> It is already on the wiki:
>
> http://herbst.homeunix.org/~jceb/dwm/4.6/current/dwm-4.6-taglayouts.diff
>
> I never had the need to use this patch. But for my eyes this patch needs
> more work. it's using dynamic memory allocation for something that it is
> already static and defined in config.h.
>
> -unsigned int* ltidxs;
> +unsigned int ltidxs[NTAGS];
>
> so, no need to alloc/free, the patch will be cleaner and simpler...
>
> ...so...
>
> While writing this..i decided to write the patch I had to move
> one variable definition after the config.h include, now it saves
> 7 LOCs (adds 12 lines)
>
> Tha patch is attached.
>
> --pancake
>
>
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:07:01 -0400
> "Jeremy O'Brien" <obrien654j_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I was just wondering how many people here use Jan's taglayouts patch.
> > Personally, I won't upgrade to a new version of dwm unless that patch
> > has been updated as well (or if I can update it myself). I find it
> > indispensable. I guess what I'm getting at is if you guys think it
> > should be included in the main dwm tree? (More of a question to Arg I
> > think ;) )
> >
> > --
> > Jeremy O'Brien aka neutral_insomniac
> > GPG key: 0xB1140FDB http://pohl.ececs.uc.edu/~jeremy/jeremy.asc
> > Linux ambelina 2.6.22.9 #1 SMP PREEMPT i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) M
> > processor 1400MHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
> >
>
>
> --pancake
>

  --pancake
Received on Fri Oct 26 2007 - 17:03:21 UTC