Re: [dwm] Taglayouts poll

then use alt+shift+space or set a Rule in config.h for them.

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:53:44 -0400
"Jeremy O'Brien" <obrien654j_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

> This is why I use it too. Some windows just don't like to be tiled.
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 05:15:57PM +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> > I use the patch, simply because i rarely mix tags and because i want
> > to float an entire tag without affecting the others.
> >
> > Maarten.
> >
> > On 10/26/07, pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com> wrote:
> > > Btw if we use a diferent layout per tag we should probably also
> > > support a different mwfactor per tag too in the same way.
> > >
> > > btw i continue saying that I don't like this idea at all.
> > >
> > > PD: I have updated the kiwi with the patch:
> > > http://www.suckless.org/wiki/dwm/patches/taglayouts
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:56:50 +0200
> > > pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > It is already on the wiki:
> > > >
> > > > http://herbst.homeunix.org/~jceb/dwm/4.6/current/dwm-4.6-taglayouts.diff
> > > >
> > > > I never had the need to use this patch. But for my eyes this patch needs
> > > > more work. it's using dynamic memory allocation for something that it is
> > > > already static and defined in config.h.
> > > >
> > > > -unsigned int* ltidxs;
> > > > +unsigned int ltidxs[NTAGS];
> > > >
> > > > so, no need to alloc/free, the patch will be cleaner and simpler...
> > > >
> > > > ...so...
> > > >
> > > > While writing this..i decided to write the patch I had to move
> > > > one variable definition after the config.h include, now it saves
> > > > 7 LOCs (adds 12 lines)
> > > >
> > > > Tha patch is attached.
> > > >
> > > > --pancake
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:07:01 -0400
> > > > "Jeremy O'Brien" <obrien654j_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I was just wondering how many people here use Jan's taglayouts patch.
> > > > > Personally, I won't upgrade to a new version of dwm unless that patch
> > > > > has been updated as well (or if I can update it myself). I find it
> > > > > indispensable. I guess what I'm getting at is if you guys think it
> > > > > should be included in the main dwm tree? (More of a question to Arg I
> > > > > think ;) )
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jeremy O'Brien aka neutral_insomniac
> > > > > GPG key: 0xB1140FDB http://pohl.ececs.uc.edu/~jeremy/jeremy.asc
> > > > > Linux ambelina 2.6.22.9 #1 SMP PREEMPT i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) M
> > > > > processor 1400MHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --pancake
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --pancake
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>

  --pancake
Received on Sat Oct 27 2007 - 02:37:03 UTC