Re: [dwm] input status text bug?

From: Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:35:56 +0100

On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 09:02:50AM +0000, Chris Webb wrote:
> "Anselm R. Garbe" <arg_AT_suckless.org> writes:
>
> > If we decide for line-based input reading, one easily could
> > block dwm from further event processing through running
> >
> > echo -n foo | dwm
> >
> > I think that'd be a big disadvantage.
>
> It could append read text to the end of stext[] whenever it successfully
> reads(), except that the first character after a '\n' clears stext[] and
> starts a new status. It needn't block.

That is true. Well I consider this as a solution.

Regards,

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
Received on Wed Oct 31 2007 - 12:35:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:03:46 UTC