Re: [dwm] Minimalism

From: markus schnalke <meillo_AT_marmaro.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:50:22 +0100

Sylvain Bertrand <sylvain.bertrand_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > And for dwm, I don't know what would be the cost to build directly the
> > > X11 packets or to recode the XCB lib straight on Linux syscalls.
> >
> > This will make dwm unportable and we should implement the different
> > ways to communicate with X11 (socket file, network,..)
>
> If portability is a major feature for dwm, then I'll pass on this.

Just have a look at the Unix philosophy:

        Choose portability over efficiency.

... nothing more to say here, I think.

meillo
Received on Thu Jan 17 2008 - 22:49:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:16:13 UTC