Re: [dwm] found a nice way to do the setgeom stuff

From: Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:11:18 +0100

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:50:23PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 3/19/08, Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org> wrote:
> > Well, it's not very general. If you use bottom stack, then
> > growm() should touch mh, th and ty instead. With DEFGEOM this is
> > possible already. Having a growm() function like your proposal
> > is too limited in my opinion.
>
> the idea is that in this way it's a one liner in config.h
> so i don't care much about limitations
>
> if one use bottom stack then one set mh only
> if one use both bottom and right stack then one can check for geom
> easily and set mw/mh accordingly

I care only about what should be mainstream and what not. And I
think you understand my reasons why I won't like those oneliners
being mainstream, if we already have DEFGEOM.

At some point I decided that there should only be one way doing
a certain thing... ;)

Kind regards,

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
Received on Wed Mar 19 2008 - 13:11:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:27:28 UTC