> No, your other fix is more correct. It should be ev->x >= bgw &&
> ev->x < x.
Then, the line 349:
if((ev->x < x + blw) && ev->button == Button1)
would be more correct if it was:
if((ev->x >= x && ev->x < x + blw) && ev->button == Button1)
Imho,
if(ev->x < x)
...
if((ev->x < x + blw) && ev->button == Button1)
are less redundant, due to function returns if the mouse event carries out the
previous condition. Anyway, I think both solutions are equally correct.
Kind regards,
Nibble
Received on Tue Mar 25 2008 - 17:05:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:28:34 UTC