On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 01:57:03PM +0100, Jordi Marine wrote:
> just for curiosity, is someone working using fibonacci layout?
Yup, I started today and so far I like it a lot. I'm using it in the way
I described in my long-winded message sent a week ago ("random wm
thoughts"). Paste with slight editing:
- The default layouts for dwm (excluding floating) only has windows of
(at most) two sizes - the size of the master-area window and the size
of tile-area window(s). This can often result in non-optimal
arrangements. If I want to watch a wget download progress bar, I give
a huge amount of pixels to a window that requires only a few, while
another window (the same size as the wget window) may be starving for
screen space.
A possible solution? I use the "push" patch which allows the user to adjust the
window ordering in the clients list. If there was a layout with
variable-sized tile-area windows (e.g., smaller windows near the top
of the stack), one could push the status-bar-like windows to the top
and have the windows that can use more space at the bottom. Yes, this
makes dwm less dynamic, but I think more flexible.
[1] http://www.suckless.org/wiki/dwm/patches/push
I just looked at the patches list again, and it seems like this could
work well with the fibonacci layouts[2]. Sadly, it hasn't been updated
since 4.6 and I hardly know C.
[2] http://www.suckless.org/wiki/dwm/patches/fibonacci
-John
Received on Thu Mar 27 2008 - 14:32:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:29:05 UTC