Re: [dwm] Documentation!

From: Sander van Dijk <a.h.vandijk_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 00:53:48 +0200

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Enno Gottox Boland <gottox_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> That's what I still think too. Fortunally DEFGEOM is gone in dwm-tip.
>
> Nevertheless there is a trend in dwm to "overoptimise" the code. I
> think dwm-4.7 was the simplest. That's why my branch is still based on
> 4.7.

I'm still running 4.7 for similar reasons.
Received on Sat May 17 2008 - 00:53:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:39:51 UTC