Re: [dwm] sic ipv6 patch

On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Sylvain Bertrand
<sylvain.bertrand_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> Freedom which does not defend itself *will* be abused again and again,

Define abuse? According to MIT/BSD, using the code in closed source
products is not abuse, it's simply use. Since that does not in any way
affect the freedom of the original MIT/BSD licensed code, it shouldn't
be a problem. Unless, of course, you want to restrict the users of
your code in what they can and can't do with it. If you want that,
fine, that's your choice, but please don't try to sell it as
"freedom", since that's simply not what it is.

Greetings, Sander.
Received on Mon May 19 2008 - 19:48:55 UTC