Re: [dwm] Freedom (was: Re: sic ipv6 patch)

From: Sander van Dijk <>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 18:07:53 +0200

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Matthias Kirschner <> wrote:
> Why do you think a user who gets DWM in a binary on some device knows a)
> that this is DWM and b) knows that DWM is licensed under MIT? So this
> user does not have the freedom to use, study, share and improve the
> software.

This has absolutely NOTHING to do with the licensing of the original
product. Just because someone can use it without telling others where
it came from does NOT in any way make the original product less free.
Received on Tue May 20 2008 - 18:07:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:42:30 UTC