Re: [dwm] Freedom (was: Re: sic ipv6 patch)

On 5/20/08, Matthias Kirschner <mk_AT_fsfe.org> wrote:
> * Sander van Dijk <a.h.vandijk_AT_gmail.com> [2008-05-20 18:23:43 +0200]:
>
>
> > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Matthias Kirschner <mk_AT_fsfe.org> wrote:
> > > Why do you think a user who gets DWM in a binary on some device knows a)
> > > that this is DWM and b) knows that DWM is licensed under MIT? So this
> > > user does not have the freedom to use, study, share and improve the
> > > software.
> >
> > So now software is only free when each and every distributor is forced
> > to educate his customers about all the wonderful things they are
> > allowed to do with it?
>
>
> For the record: I did not say that. Software is free, when the user has
> the freedom to use, study, share and improve it.
>
>
> > This is just another display of your misunderstanding of the concept
> > "freedom". Really, buy a dictionary...
>
>
> Thanks for the advise :)

Yeah, very funny. This is plain ridiculous

-- 
hiro