Re: [dwm] using bitaray for tags (PATCH)

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:14:27PM +0200, Premysl Hruby wrote:
> That's the reason why i wrote it as macros. That bitops can also be
> written as inline functions, without any harm to binary size or
> performance.
>
> And yes, with bitarrays there are some portability issues. But asside of
> limiting number of possible tags, there's no portability downside for
> dwm, imho. (it will compile, but maximum of tags is architecture
> dependent)

Well, if someone needs more than 32 tags, buy a 64bit machine.

We should definately get sponsored by the hardware industry at
some point. ;)

dwm encourages users to buy bigger screens and 64bit hardware.

Kind regards,

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361