Re: [dwm] using bitaray for tags (PATCH)

From: Enno \ <gottox_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 13:09:33 +0200

Here is yet another update to the patch which includes chances
discussed on #dwm.

2008/5/21, Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org>:
> Hi I like your patches (also the version of anydot).
>
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:49:16AM +0200, Enno Gottox Boland wrote:
> > 2008/5/21, Szabolcs Nagy <nszabolcs_AT_gmail.com>:
> > > in config.h referencing tags has changed in rules but not in keys.
> > Yes, arg has discussed yesterday if it's possible to change const char
> > *arg to void *arg. if this works, i'll change the key behavior too.
>
>
> Ok, I won't touch the code until the evening today, so feel free
> to use the (int[]) 1 syntax, we are going to change the
> argument of Key-functions to void *.
>
>
> > > the (1 << tagnum) in rules is a bit nasty
> > > it is probably nicer to do the shifting in setup();
> > you mean in applyrules? - No I don't think so. It adds much more
> > flexibility. You can define bitmasks as 0b10001 to tag a client to the
> > first and the fifth tag or you can use ~0 to make it "sticky".
>
>
> I agree, that allows also to get rid of cloned rules.
>
>
> > > instead of
> > > i < LENGTH(tags) && i < sizeof(int) * 8;
> > > what about checking once
> > > if(LENGTH(tags) > sizeof(int) * CHAR_BIT)
> > > eprint("Maximum number of tags: %d\n", sizeof(int) * CHAR_BIT);
> > > in setup();
> > The problem about this is it denies users from using one config.h with
> > many tags on different architectures. Furthermore I wouldn't check
> > this at runtime but at compiletime. (maybe we can use "#warning" as
> > compromise)
>
>
> Well, regarding to
>
> http://coding.derkeiler.com/Archive/C_CPP/comp.lang.c/2005-01/1697.html
>
> a compile time evaluation isn't possible. So I think we should
> stick to Szabolcs proposal to reject the setup in setup():
>
> if(sizeof(unsigned int) * CHAR_BIT < LENGTH(tags))
> eprint("error: number of tags is restricted to: %u\n", sizeof(unsigned int) * CHAR_BIT);
>
> Usually nobody will use more than 16 tags imho, so that we
> should not expect a problem here if sizeof(int) is only 2 on
> some exotic hosts.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> --
> Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
>
>

-- 
http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro
http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm - Gnuffy on Ipaq (Codename Peggy)

Received on Wed May 21 2008 - 13:09:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:43:25 UTC