Re: [dwm] Freedom (was: Re: sic ipv6 patch)

From: Archie Elberling <archie_AT_codersoffortune.net>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 23:02:09 +0100

<f4d8fa40805190752o48c9de1di4a7fd5edfc22ee59_AT_mail.gmail.com>
<d512a4f30805190817me73033cp18f54e02639107a8_AT_mail.gmail.com>
<ba0d3bc70805191048s4a0d62e0nba9efcf4f88e7338_AT_mail.gmail.com>
<20080519183110.GA5889_AT_mbwg.de>
<ba0d3bc70805191338v47d40cbud2ab5ec132f700f_AT_mail.gmail.com>
<20080519215413.GA32015_AT_mbwg.de>
<ba0d3bc70805200202s2074e952k3cce06fffd628ae9_AT_mail.gmail.com>
<20080520092152.GA16363_AT_suckless.org>
<5095e3a90805231811t2fc2a243l21e23a04187b890c_AT_mail.gmail.com> <20080524100136.GL3744_AT_mbwg.de>
Message-ID: <69f5fb7d00192c23dac197d28ef4e11a_AT_localhost>
X-Sender: archie_AT_codersoffortune.net
Received: from cador.lan [10.0.0.100] with HTTP/1.1 (POST); Sat, 24 May 2008
        23:02:09 +0100
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Sat, 24 May 2008 12:01:36 +0200, Matthias Kirschner <mk_AT_fsfe.org> wrote:
> First it is a very bad idea to write your own licenses (see "6. License
> proliferation considered harmful").
You could make similar arguments about window managers ( only partially a
joke)

>Second this change would make the
> license incompatible with the GPL (which should be obviated even if you
> do not agree with the GPL).
If you do not agree with something, then what is the point in making effort
to support it?
Received on Sun May 25 2008 - 00:03:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:44:02 UTC