Premysl Hruby wrote:
>>> patch attached.
>> "return (char *)1;"?
>>
>> cistrstr(s, sub) is supposed to return a pointer to the first
>> occurence of "sub" in "s", or NULL if there is none; not some fixed
>> pointer to memory that's probably not even allocated to the process.
>>
>> Greetings, Sander.
>>
>
> Yes, that's true, but return value is only used only in comparison if is
> or isn't null, to signalize that substring is or isn't contained in the
> string.
Then change the return type to bool or int or whatever and avoid the
ugly casts.
Cheers,
Marc
-- Marc Andre Tanner >< http://www.brain-dump.org/ >< GPG key: CF7D56C0Received on Thu Jun 26 2008 - 17:09:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:51:33 UTC