Re: [dwm] [patch] Minor code cleanup, part 2

From: Szabolcs Nagy <nszabolcs_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:19:19 +0200

On 8/14/08, Martin Hurton <martin.hurton_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> Those other checks seems ok to me.

what's the difference?

either you assert Success==0, so the identifier 'Success' is not
needed anywhere, or using Success is mandatory

i don't see why would one mix the two.
Received on Thu Aug 14 2008 - 16:19:19 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Szabolcs Nagy: "Re: [dwm] [patch] Minor code cleanup, part 2"
Previous message: Martin Hurton: "Re: [dwm] [patch] Minor code cleanup, part 2"
In reply to: Martin Hurton: "Re: [dwm] [patch] Minor code cleanup, part 2"
Next in thread: Szabolcs Nagy: "Re: [dwm] [patch] Minor code cleanup, part 2"
Reply: Szabolcs Nagy: "Re: [dwm] [patch] Minor code cleanup, part 2"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Aug 14 2008 - 16:24:04 UTC