Re: [dwm] dwm: request to discuss

On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Maxim Vuets <maxim.vuets_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

> 2008/8/29, Matthias-Christian Ott <ott_AT_enolink.de>:
>
> >> Apache httpd with threads and mod_*.so, PAM... So every
> >
> > You are using Apache? Shame on you ;). Seriously Apache is definitively
> > not suckless.
>
> (: propose something less sucker, please. I'll take a look.

lighttpd - definitely sucks less

>
>
> > Hmmm, I think threads make it just easier to write software that does
> > several things concurrently.
>
> Makes easier to write? Oh man, I think you just have not ever write
> and debug real multi-threaded application (;
>
> >> Just for a note: yes, .so for dwm is evil. I've already said it.
> >> But unix-way IPC---looks not so bad, I think.
> >
> > Do you mean pipes or sockets? Pipe are definitely suckless. But this
> > whole UNIX socket API sucks really.
>
> Yes, I meant pipes. I like pipes.
> Cannot understand why socket API sucks.
>
> --
> Hoc est simplicissimum!
> maxim.vuets.name
>
>
Received on Sat Aug 30 2008 - 20:55:58 UTC