Re: [dwm] Re: urgent windows border

From: Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 09:35:14 +0000

2008/12/4 yy <yiyu.jgl_AT_gmail.com>:
> 2008/12/4 Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com>:
>> I have mixed feelings about this patch. Does someone has strong
>> arguments that this would be a good idea for upstream dwm?
>>
>
> I also have mixed feelings... I wrote it because I didn't see urgent
> windows when they were visible (I know this sentence looks stupid, I
> know, but you get it), and since the implementation resulted simpler I
> decided to post it here.
> There is another middle-way solution which you could be interested in:
> move the clearurgent() call to focus(), like in my patch, but forget
> about the urgent border color (which is what makes the patch uglier).
> This way, you could save some loc while getting the functionality of
> notifying urgent clients in viewed tags. If you have no time or
> whatever I can modify my patch and send it to the list tomorrow.
> OTOH, I will probably maintain the patch for the border color, at
> least for the moment. But I won't post it here or anything if nobody
> else is interested.

Yes, I did something similiar for the 5.3.1 bugfix release I'm
currently uploading.

Kind regards,
--Anselm
Received on Sat Dec 06 2008 - 09:35:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Dec 06 2008 - 09:36:03 UTC