Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3

Jeremy Jay <dinkumator_AT_gmail.com> writes:

> This was my hunch too, glad someone got it before me though. This
> patch fixes the problem with 5.3. Probably the same with the double-
> fork version too.

The open FD was my first guess too, but the double-fork version didn't
close any fds either, so I assumed it must be something else.

Guillaume, if you apply the "close(0)" patch, does the problem go away?

I'm away from my dwm computer right now, or I'd try it myself.

Neale
Received on Sat Dec 06 2008 - 16:26:25 UTC