Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3

From: James Turner <james_AT_bsdgroup.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:04:36 -0500

After taking some time and looking at the different signal headers on
OpenBSD only #include <sys/signal.h> is required, no need to #include
<signal.h> which contains additional functions.

-- 
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org

Received on Sat Dec 13 2008 - 01:04:36 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: stanio_AT_cs.tu-berlin.de: "Re: [dwm] dwm and dualhead"
Previous message: Mate Nagy: "Re: [dwm] plan for dwm"
Maybe in reply to: Anselm R Garbe: "[dwm] dwm-5.3"
Next in thread: Frederic Chardon: "Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3"
Reply: Frederic Chardon: "Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3"
Reply: Neale Pickett: "Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Dec 13 2008 - 01:12:04 UTC