Re: [dwm] [Offtopic] minimalistic filesystem ncurses viewer

Hey All,
What's wrong with midnight commander? It's an oldy but a goody. Two pane
file interface, has a boatload of features. Is it the "bloat" of these other
features that you're trying to avoid?

Personally, I don't use a file manager. A straight bash prompt with cd, ls,
tree etc is fine for day to day use.
Instead of the binary tree program, I found this bash-oneliner replacement:
find . -print | sed -e 's;[^/]*/;|____;g;s;____|; |;g'
It's about the same speed as the regular program and more suckless then a
dedicated binary.(IMO)

--
Ian Daniher
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Jack Woehr <jax_AT_well.com> wrote:
> Ricardo Catalinas Jiménez wrote:
>
>> I tried it after vifm but what I really wanted was a very minimal
>> filesystem viewer with vim-like commands, that's why I wrote fm.
>>
>>
>
> Cute, from screenshot and description, fm reminds me of FULIST on z/VM.
>
> But it doesn't build on OpenBSD:
>
>   $ gmake CC=gcc
>   ctags fm.c fs.c ui.c cmd.c fm.h
>   gcc -g -Wall -pedantic -ansi $(pkg-config --cflags glib-2.0)   -c -o
>   fm.o fm.c
>   fm.c: In function `set_sighandlers':
>   fm.c:60: error: `SIGWINCH' undeclared (first use in this function)
>   fm.c:60: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
>   fm.c:60: error: for each function it appears in.)
>   fm.c: In function `unset_sighandlers':
>   fm.c:73: error: `SIGWINCH' undeclared (first use in this function)
>   gmake: *** [fm.o] Error 1
>
> which is kind of weird because even if I specifically #include
> <sys/signal.h>
> in which `SIGWINCH' is declared it doesn't find it. Haven't had time yet
> to dig in deep.
>
> --
> Jack J. Woehr            # I run for public office from time to time. It's
> like
> http://www.well.com/~jax <http://www.well.com/%7Ejax> # working out at the
> gym, you sweat a lot, don't get
> http://www.softwoehr.com # anywhere, and you fall asleep easily
> afterwards.
>