Re: [dwm] No Border Behaviour

From: Szabolcs Nagy <nszabolcs_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:15:17 +0100

On 1/9/09, voltaic <voltaic_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree with Matthias. The purpose of a border is to separate one
> client from another. If there is only one client visible at a given
> time (i.e. monocle) then borders in my opinion are a waste of space.

what's the problem? that's how tip works

read carefully:

> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2009/1/8 Matthias-Christian Ott <ott_AT_mirix.org>:
>>> borders if only one particular window is visible, because they aren't
>>> serving any purpose. In others words: borders are superfluous in that
>>> case.
>>
>> I think that is exactly how the current dwm implementation is supposed
>> to be -- I never said anything different to that (at least not that I
>> intended it).

the only debatable question is the monocle+multiple window case, but
the current solution seems perfectly reasonable

you can write your own layout in config.h if different behaviour is needed
Received on Fri Jan 09 2009 - 07:15:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jan 09 2009 - 07:24:04 UTC