Do you remenber when it was and if it was the same patch's name?? This would
help my googling :-)
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:04 PM, James Turner <james_AT_bsdgroup.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:01:03PM -0500, thierry beauquier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a patch to have pure horizontal tiling?
> >
> > Meaning:
> >
> > +--------------------------+
> > | |
> > +--------------------------+
> > | |
> > +--------------------------+
> > | |
> > +--------------------------+
> >
> > Regards
> > Thierry
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 10:29 AM, James Turner <james_AT_bsdgroup.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 10:25:41AM -0500, David Neu wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I was just about to download the bottom stack patch for dwm-5.4.1
> from,
> > > >
> > > > http://www.suckless.org/dwm/patches/bottom_stack.html
> > > >
> > > > but noticed it's dated 20081217. Is this correct?
> > > >
> > > > Many thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > David
> > >
> > > Hello there, I create a new bottom stack patch against hg the minute
> > > something changes and tag it for the up coming release. It should apply
> > > fine to 5.4.1 as well but I havent tested it. Let me know if you have
> > > issues.
> > >
> > > --
> > > James Turner
> > > BSD Group Consulting
> > > http://www.bsdgroup.org
>
> I believe the original bottom stack patch did support that, when I kind
> of took over keeping it up to date I dropped that support since I didn't
> use it. You might be able to find an older patch via google that still
> has the behavior and bring it up to date.
>
> --
> James Turner
> BSD Group Consulting
> http://www.bsdgroup.org
>
>
Received on Mon Feb 09 2009 - 19:19:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Feb 09 2009 - 19:24:04 UTC