Re: [dwm] Bottom Stack Patch

Works perfectly well. Thanks again

Thierry

On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Jeremy Jay <dinkumator_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

> not incredibly difficult to modify the existing tile() function for
> this.... this isnt the most up-to-date version of dwm, but plop
> something similar to this into your config.h
>
> -------------------
>
> static void
> htile(void) {
> int y, h;
> unsigned int i, n;
> Client *c;
>
> for(n = 0, c = nexttiled(clients); c; c = nexttiled(c->next), n++);
> if(n == 0)
> return;
>
> /* tile stack */
> y = wy;
> h = wh / n;
> if(h < bh)
> h = wh;
>
> for(i = 0, c = nexttiled(clients); c; c = nexttiled(c->next), i++) {
> resize(c, wx, y, ww - 2 * c->bw, /* remainder */ ((i + 1 ==
> n)
> ? wy + wh - y - 2 * c->bw : h - 2 * c->bw),
> resizehints);
> if(h != wh)
> y = c->y + HEIGHT(c);
> }
> }
>
> static Layout layouts[] = {
> /* symbol arrange function */
> { "[]=", tile }, /* first entry is default */
> { "===", htile }, /* horizontal tile */
> { "><>", NULL }, /* no layout function means floating
> behavior */
> { "[M]", monocle },
> };
>
> ---------------------
>
> On Mon 09 Feb 2009 - 02:26PM, James Turner wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:19:05PM -0500, thierry beauquier wrote:
> > > Do you remenber when it was and if it was the same patch's name?? This
> would
> > > help my googling :-)
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:04 PM, James Turner <james_AT_bsdgroup.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:01:03PM -0500, thierry beauquier wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there a patch to have pure horizontal tiling?
> > > > >
> > > > > Meaning:
> > > > >
> > > > > +--------------------------+
> > > > > | |
> > > > > +--------------------------+
> > > > > | |
> > > > > +--------------------------+
> > > > > | |
> > > > > +--------------------------+
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > Thierry
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 10:29 AM, James Turner <james_AT_bsdgroup.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 10:25:41AM -0500, David Neu wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I was just about to download the bottom stack patch for
> dwm-5.4.1
> > > > from,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.suckless.org/dwm/patches/bottom_stack.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > but noticed it's dated 20081217. Is this correct?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Many thanks!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > David
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hello there, I create a new bottom stack patch against hg the
> minute
> > > > > > something changes and tag it for the up coming release. It should
> apply
> > > > > > fine to 5.4.1 as well but I havent tested it. Let me know if you
> have
> > > > > > issues.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > James Turner
> > > > > > BSD Group Consulting
> > > > > > http://www.bsdgroup.org
> > > >
> > > > I believe the original bottom stack patch did support that, when I
> kind
> > > > of took over keeping it up to date I dropped that support since I
> didn't
> > > > use it. You might be able to find an older patch via google that
> still
> > > > has the behavior and bring it up to date.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > James Turner
> > > > BSD Group Consulting
> > > > http://www.bsdgroup.org
> >
> > I don't remember how many dwm's ago it was but the format should be the
> > same as dwm-5.4-bstack.diff. Maybe look in the 3 or earlier 4 releases?
> >
> > --
> > James Turner
> > BSD Group Consulting
> > http://www.bsdgroup.org
> >
>
>
Received on Mon Feb 09 2009 - 21:07:12 UTC