Re: [dwm] dwm's future

From: Preben Randhol <randhol_AT_pvv.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:00:07 +0200

On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:01:20 -0400
Ross Mohn <rpmohn_AT_waxandwane.org> wrote:

> Or maybe they're getting a kick back? -RPM

Bullshit! Such slander doe not serve Open Source! The reason for
choosing commercial packages is because they have done the job. It is
fine to choose an open source alternative, but it has to be able to
preform the task, which has not always been true for Octave f.ex.

That said, in most cases there is now no reason no to choose Matlab
over Octave.
Received on Tue Apr 28 2009 - 20:00:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Apr 28 2009 - 20:12:05 UTC