> Personally I have noticed that locking my laptops scaling CPU to the
> lowest frequency does give quite a noticeable improvement to the battery
> life, around an extra hour on top of the usual 4~ hours and reduces the
> temperature enough to make the fan shut off . Just enabling on-demand
> scaling didn't help much as it would scale up to full frequency far to
> often. Even with the CPU locked in lo frequency mode it almost never lags.
>
>
Thanks all for confirmation. Since I only have a desktop, no
notebook/netbook ;-( it is somehow difficult to verify the
improvement. I now lock the cpu frequency to 1.1GHZ (half of the
original 2.1G).
Less heat means less power consumption, I guess someone suggested,
(I'm not sure that's why I asked for advise), that it takes more time
to complete the job at lower frequency so that actual power
consumption will in some case increase.
-- regards, ==================================================== GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 唐詩187 杜甫 登樓 花近高樓傷客心 萬方多難此登臨 錦江春色來天地 玉壘浮雲變古今 北極朝庭終不改 西山寇盜莫相侵 可憐後主還祠廟 日暮聊為梁父吟Received on Sat May 09 2009 - 05:56:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat May 09 2009 - 06:00:05 UTC