Re: [dwm] musca wm

What I find interesting is the support for multi-screen. Actually I'm
using wmii at work,
because dwm cannot properly handle multiscreen layouts and this made me
use the
mouse too much.

Wmii has some bugs, but at least is IMHO better for multiscreen layouts.
I think this is
the eternal discussion, because it is hard to find the 'best' approach
to this problem
for dwm.

But for single-screen environments dwm still rocks :)

I really miss the conceptual experimentation that dwm was in the past.
But I agree that
we should probably focus on other topics like 'st' or a full OS based on
minimalist software
(based on Linux without GNU craps) ...

What do you think about creating an offtopic mailing list in suckless
for discussing such
kind of topics, instead of using the dwm@ one like nowadays happen.

--pancake

Benjamin Conner wrote:
> it's interesting. But I prefer dwm or wmii.
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com
> <mailto:garbeam_AT_gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> 2009/5/15 pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com <mailto:pancake_AT_youterm.com>>:
> > another tiling manager with interesting features:
> >
> > http://aerosuidae.net/musca.html
>
> Looks to me it's aiming the original WMI without tabbing a little bit.
> I definately prefer the dwm way after all ;)
>
> Kind regards,
> Anselm
>
>
Received on Fri May 15 2009 - 13:42:24 UTC