Re: [dwm] Re: New mailing list

Ok, I meant the following:

Let's have hackers@ be some meta list which sends to dwm@ and wmii@,
and those subscribed to hackers will receive dwm@ and wmii@. Those who
are only interested in dwm@ or wmii@ specifically could just stay on
dwm@ resp. wmii@. That should be technically possible.

Kind regards,
Anselm

2009/5/20 Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com>:
> I think that's a sensible proposal, let's do it.
>
> For those who are subscribed already, there won't be a difference. The
> new ones will subscribe to hackers. We will keep dwm@ and wmii@
> working, but direct it to hackers@.
>
> Kind regards,
> Anselm
>
> 2009/5/20 markus schnalke <meillo_AT_marmaro.de>:
>> [2009-05-20 08:35] Uriel <uriel99_AT_gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I suggested a while ago to merge wmii@ and dwm@ into hackers@, both
>>> lists are rather low level, and there is much overlap, and such a
>>> single list would be more fitting for new minor side projects and for
>>> 'offtopic' discussion.
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>>> Right now when one has something to say that doesn't quite fit in
>>> wmii@ or dwm@, or that could fit in both, you have to pick one list at
>>> random, or to cross post, and both options suck.
>>
>>> > > What do you think about creating an offtopic mailing list in suckless for
>>> > > discussing such
>>> > > kind of topics, instead of using the dwm@ one like nowadays happen.
>>> >
>>> > I think it's been the charme of dwm@ to discuss lot's of other things,
>>
>> Yes. Merge, don't split.
>>
>>
>> meillo
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iD8DBQFKE6ly6aFpZ+X9qBIRArW7AJ4sXPrq+pagoWmS2AKT032PSmqOTQCfXsgx
>> b3yhcxM+v9dwI/Mo9IklZHU=
>> =OWPz
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>
Received on Wed May 20 2009 - 09:04:12 UTC