Re: [dwm] nanox

From: John Yates <john_AT_yates-sheets.org>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 09:17:07 -0400

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

> I have a completely new WS in mind, design-wise with no X
> dependency, just an X legacy support layer instead.

> ... , we want a different WS, not a state-machine WS like X.

Do you envision including xcb style asynchrony?

/john
Received on Wed May 20 2009 - 13:17:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 20 2009 - 13:24:05 UTC