Re: [hackers] [sbase] Double NARGS || sin

From: Dimitris Papastamos <dp_AT_spl9.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:03:18 +0000

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:58:00PM +0100, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> > Consider, these numbers are in bytes not the # of arguments.
>
> Uhmmm, I gather it now. I saw only the diff and I interpreted it
> incorrectly. Sorry for the noise.

No worries, when I first started working on this I thought ARG_MAX
was the maximum number of arguments. Talking about intuitive naming.
Received on Thu Jan 16 2014 - 13:03:18 CET