On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:25:09 -0800
Evan Gates <evan.gates_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> The arg loops can simply be for (; *argv; argv++) as the standard
> guarantees argv[argc] is NULL.
Hey Evan,
I discussed this with stateless and we came to the conclusion that
the argc-approach is more idiomatic.
I personally favor for-loops with guaranteed break-conditions, but
you're right about the standard.
Cheers
FRIGN
--
FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
Received on Sat Feb 28 2015 - 22:36:24 CET