On Sun, 1 May 2016 00:40:34 +0000
Petr Vaněk <arkamar_AT_atlas.cz> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 11:46:32PM +0200, Mattias Andrée
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 23:44:43 +0000
> > Petr Vaněk <arkamar_AT_atlas.cz> wrote:
> >
> > > The macro \\ should not be used when an empty line
> > > follows. ---
> > > doc/refsheet.tex | 5 ++---
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/doc/refsheet.tex b/doc/refsheet.tex
> > > index d0c31f7..106d8b5 100644
> > > --- a/doc/refsheet.tex
> > > +++ b/doc/refsheet.tex
> > > _AT_@ -6,11 +6,10 @@
> > >
> > >
> > > {\Huge libzahl}
> > > -\\
> > > +\vspace{1em plus .2em minus .1em}
> > >
> > > Unless specified otherwise, all times are of type
> > > {\tt z\_t}. -\\ \\
> > > -
> > > +\vspace{2em plus .4em minus .2em}
> > >
> > > \begin{tabular}{lll}
> > > \textbf{Initialisation} &
> > > {} &
> > > {} \\
> >
> > I generally just use \\ to avoid clutter. But I will
> > apply the patch momentarily.
>
> Thanks, I just wanted to show, that \\ is not mentioned
> for vertical spacing.
>
In this case, \vspace does not clutter too much.
But is some cases it is. So I have a habbit of just
using \\ when the exact spacing does not matter.
But I really should use \vspace in simple cases like
this file.
I am currently working on cleanup all mess (the tables),
so if that can be improved, please way until you see me
push a commit that rewrites the table entirely.
Received on Sun May 01 2016 - 00:44:56 CEST