Re: [hackers] [PATCH] [slock] Remove faulty example and add a section on security considerations
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Ali H. Fardan <
raiz_AT_firemail.cc
>
Date
: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 22:05:47 +0300
PS: I think this is where the code originated:
https://github.com/chjj/slock
Received on
Wed Sep 28 2016 - 21:05:47 CEST
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
FRIGN: "Re: [hackers] [PATCH] [slock] Remove faulty example and add a section on security considerations"
Previous message
:
Ali H. Fardan: "Re: [hackers] [PATCH] [slock] Remove faulty example and add a section on security considerations"
In reply to
:
Ali H. Fardan: "Re: [hackers] [PATCH] [slock] Remove faulty example and add a section on security considerations"
Next in thread
:
FRIGN: "Re: [hackers] [PATCH] [slock] Remove faulty example and add a section on security considerations"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.0
: Wed Sep 28 2016 - 21:12:18 CEST