On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 12:53:08 -0800
Michael Forney <mforney_AT_mforney.org> wrote:
> On 2/1/17, Mattias Andrée <maandree_AT_kth.se> wrote:
> > I feel that it is kind of a given that man(1) is needed
> > (why else are we writing man pages) however, it can be
> > argued in which project to put it. The man-db
> > implementation everyone's using is just way too
> > overkill.
>
> mdocml is quite good and includes a man(1)
> implementation. It supports mdoc(7) and man(7), and does
> not depend on groff.
>
Just like man-db, mdocml has stuff we probably can do without,
so I would still suggest adding my patch, but if its roff
implementation is less sucky than groff, that part could be
used instead of groff.
maandree
Received on Thu Feb 02 2017 - 23:15:08 CET