[hackers] [quark] Improve vhost handling and fix an uninitialized variable use || Laslo Hunhold
commit 075e314bdd4f7756f7563b7b8ba645de712bf5ac
Author: Laslo Hunhold <dev_AT_frign.de>
AuthorDate: Wed Aug 2 08:50:55 2017 +0200
Commit: Laslo Hunhold <dev_AT_frign.de>
CommitDate: Wed Aug 2 08:51:16 2017 +0200
Improve vhost handling and fix an uninitialized variable use
It was not a good thing to depend on the value of i so late in the code
again. If for some reason a loop is added beforehand it would break the
logic.
diff --git a/quark.c b/quark.c
index a201f54..8137081 100644
--- a/quark.c
+++ b/quark.c
_AT_@ -561,9 +561,10 @@ sendresponse(int fd, struct request *r)
int hasport, ipv6host;
static char realtarget[PATH_MAX], tmptarget[PATH_MAX], t[TIMESTAMP_LEN];
char *p, *q, *mime;
- const char *err;
+ const char *vhostmatch, *err;
/* match vhost */
+ vhostmatch = NULL;
if (vhosts) {
for (i = 0; i < LEN(vhost); i++) {
/* switch to vhost directory if there is a match */
_AT_@ -573,6 +574,7 @@ sendresponse(int fd, struct request *r)
return sendstatus(fd, (errno == EACCES) ?
S_FORBIDDEN : S_NOT_FOUND);
}
+ vhostmatch = vhost[i].name;
break;
}
}
_AT_@ -610,8 +612,8 @@ sendresponse(int fd, struct request *r)
}
/* redirect if targets differ or host is non-canonical */
- if (strcmp(r->target, realtarget) || (vhosts && r->field[REQ_HOST][0] &&
- i < LEN(vhost) && strcmp(r->field[REQ_HOST], vhost[i].name))) {
+ if (strcmp(r->target, realtarget) || (vhosts && vhostmatch &&
+ strcmp(r->field[REQ_HOST], vhostmatch))) {
/* do we need to add a port to the Location? */
hasport = strcmp(port, "80");
_AT_@ -636,8 +638,8 @@ sendresponse(int fd, struct request *r)
S_MOVED_PERMANENTLY,
status_str[S_MOVED_PERMANENTLY],
timestamp(time(NULL), t), ipv6host ? "[" : "",
- r->field[REQ_HOST][0] ? (vhosts && i < LEN(vhost)) ?
- vhost[i].name : r->field[REQ_HOST] : host,
+ r->field[REQ_HOST][0] ? (vhosts && vhostmatch) ?
+ vhostmatch : r->field[REQ_HOST] : host,
ipv6host ? "]" : "", hasport ? ":" : "",
hasport ? port : "", tmptarget) < 0) {
return S_REQUEST_TIMEOUT;
_AT_@ -695,10 +697,10 @@ sendresponse(int fd, struct request *r)
/* range */
lower = 0;
upper = st.st_size - 1;
-
if (r->field[REQ_RANGE][0]) {
/* parse field */
p = r->field[REQ_RANGE];
+ err = NULL;
if (strncmp(p, "bytes=", sizeof("bytes=") - 1)) {
return sendstatus(fd, S_BAD_REQUEST);
Received on Wed Aug 02 2017 - 08:51:35 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Wed Aug 02 2017 - 09:01:00 CEST