Re: [hackers] [dwm] fix keysyms processing by kfx_
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Anselm Garbe <
garbeam_AT_gmail.com
>
Date
: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:04:12 +0200
On 8 October 2017 at 14:37, Martin Kühne <mysatyre_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> Aren't we depending on Xft already?
>
>
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9838385/replace-of-xkeycodetokeysym#22418839
What has Xft todo with XKB? Or was your remark just implying if you
gave up on X fonts why don't you gave up on X key handling as well?
BR,
Anselm
Received on
Wed Oct 11 2017 - 10:04:12 CEST
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Anselm Garbe: "Re: [hackers] [dwm] rm transient floating windows || Daniel Cousens"
Previous message
:
git_AT_suckless.org: "[hackers] [dwm] simplify isfixed conditions || Daniel Cousens"
In reply to
:
Martin Kühne: "Re: [hackers] [dwm] fix keysyms processing by kfx_"
Next in thread
:
Hiltjo Posthuma: "Re: [hackers] [dwm] fix keysyms processing by kfx_"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.0
: Wed Oct 11 2017 - 10:12:37 CEST